Short Review of Trio JR-500S Ham Radio Receiver, and Comparision With SDRplay RSP1A Software Defined Fadio

My "new" Trio JR-500S Receiver, and some general comparison with a modern SDR receiver.

• Old Trio JR-500S ham Radio receiver
• SDRplay RSP1A Software Defined Radio

 These days I came across an old Trio JR-500S ham radio receiver that was selling for $50 and bought it. According to the data I found on the internet, the device was manufactured in 1966 by the company "Trio", which after 1986 was known as Kenwood Corporation. At the time it was produced, it was advertised as a high performance communications receiver made especially to cover the amateur bands between 3.5 and 29.7 MHz.

   And, as always, after the first power-up the receiver did not work even though I received assurances from the seller that the device was fully functional. At first glance, the radio is in excellent condition, the interior was full of dust and visually I concluded that it has not been serviced or modified until now, which is a great sign. After that I detailed cleaned it, and immediately proceeded to find out the problem. After a quick check according to the circuit diagram that I downloaded from the Internet, I discovered that there is no anode voltage on the Tubes.

  After that I found that this voltage was coming to the "remote" connector that serves to control the radio via a transmitter. It was then clear to me that the seller had used the radio together with a transmitter, so I connected the anode voltage to the Tubes by soldering a jumper as shown in the pictures.

  After that I found that this voltage was coming to the "remote" connector that serves to control the radio via a transmitter. It was then clear to me that the seller had used the radio together with a transmitter, so I connected the anode voltage to the Tubes by soldering a jumper as shown in the pictures.

 If you want to make a PCB for any electronic project, PCBway is a great choice for you. PCBway is one of the most experienced PCB manufacturing company in China in field of PCB prototype and fabrication. They have a large online community where you can find a Open Source projects, and you can also share your project there. From my personal experience I can tell you that on this community you can find many useful projects with alredy designed PCBs, from where you can place an order directly.

  For testing the shortwave area I will use antenna splitter that I have made before, which is very simple to make and gives excellent results. In one of the following videos I will describe how to make it. 

Also, I will use equal conditions (antenna) for both receivers, which in this case is a home-made "Loop on Ground Antenna" LoG , which I made according to the instructions of Matt Roberts (KK5JY.net),immediately after purchasing the radio. I want to say just a few words about this wonderful antenna.

 My home is located in a less-than-friendly RF environment surrounded by large buildings on all sides, but luckily I have a small yard where I placed the 15 feet square antenna right around the trunk of a large tree, installed directly on the surface. I still can't believe how good features has this antenna. First of all, the construction time is less than an hour, and from the material, you need any insulated wire of suitable length. I have installed several types of antennas on my roof, including Mini Whip, long wire antenna with antenna tuner, small loop active antenna, but the last LoG antenna is definitely my favorite. The signal-to-noise ratio is simply amazing, thanks to the fact that there are no active signal amplification components. With this antenna, I receive signals that I couldn't even think about until now, so I especially recommend you, if you have a little yard space, to try it. 

  And now let's connect the two radios mentioned in the title, and briefly compare the features. For more reliable results, I will try reception in several areas, during the day and at night.

 And finally, a short conclusion:

  Obviously, no real comparison can be made, considering that one device contains only 7 Tubes manufactured in the sixties, and the other device contains millions of semiconductors and modern precision crystal oscillators plus modern PC spectrum analysis and control software. The software contains countless options including continuous scanning of the entire SV range, step size, demodulation of all types of analog and digital signals, many types of filters, change of AGC parameters, RF Gain control and many, many more.

  On the other hand, at least for me, it is a great pleasure to receive signals on the old analog receiver with precise movement of the knob and the frequency shown on the circular scale located in the central area, no need for a computer and many settings. It's just a matter of plugging in an antenna and turning the dial. Of course, the reception is significantly weaker, but it's my great pleasure to have another wonderful retro receiver in my collection.

  In the next period, I will try to make and connect a "Panadapter" to this radio, which in a certain way will bring it closer to modern software radios in terms of options. Of course, if I succeed, I will present the results on this channel.