Emergency Response Habitat for Flooding and Hurricanes: Vista Fuerte

by Marcos-Leon in Outside > Survival

266 Views, 2 Favorites, 0 Comments

Emergency Response Habitat for Flooding and Hurricanes: Vista Fuerte

Untitled design (6).png
Annotation 2024-06-10 151653.png

Initial Idea & Research

1.1 Thesis statement

The escalating frequency and intensity of hurricanes and flooding demand urgent attention. Climate change is not just a future concern; it is an immediate issue that has been neglected for far too long. Governments and private organizations worldwide have prioritized urban areas, overlooking the needs of rural communities. This is where Vista Fuerte comes in; as rural areas are beginning to be forgotten, this project stands to fill that crucial gap.

1.2 Understanding the issue

The response times of the government and private organizations are frequently characterized by sluggishness and inefficacy, particularly in urgent situations where time can be a matter of life or death. This is the rationale behind Vista Fuerte's ambition to serve as a swift, localized solution. Additionally, many agencies tend to adopt a reactive approach, primarily focusing on post-disaster reconstruction. I argue that this approach is flawed. Vista Fuerte is specifically crafted as a proactive solution tailored to address the needs of rural areas.

1.3 Functionality

Vista Fuerte aims to remain functional even in the absence of flooding or hurricanes. The project will achieve this objective by improving access to medical services in rural coastal communities. Additionally, it will assist law enforcement in search, rescue, and coordination.

1.4 Solving issues

Vista Fuerte addresses these issues through a complex village-like set of buildings designed to interact and be interdependent. A comparison can be made with fire lookout posts, designed to spot where help is needed, but that is just the beginning for Vista Fuerte as it will also administer that help and coordinate rescue and response efforts.

2.1 Primary Design Intent

The project consists of three main buildings and two service buildings. The true highlight of the project is the use of shipping containers in every single building. In theory, that allows for greater affordability, constructability, and accessibility.

2.2 Specific Building Design Intent

  • Command and Control Building: The largest and most versatile building on the site; the Command and Control Building serves as the central coordination hub for multiple agencies operating in conjunction with Vista Fuerte. In addition to its primary function, the building is equipped with facilities to accommodate drones on its rooftop. These drones are tasked with search and rescue operations, coordination support, and assisting in various other human-related tasks. To further enhance its proactive capabilities, the building also houses a weather station, enabling more effective coordination of efforts in the local area.
  • Medical center: This essential component of the project encompasses multiple assignments of varying complexity. Its primary objective is to function as the focal point for a swift and efficient medical response. A secondary aim is to facilitate the launch of aid missions to surrounding areas and establish temporary smaller response centers. The tertiary goal is to surpass existing medical facilities in the project's operational area and act as an intermediary between paramedic attention centers and full-scale hospitals. Importantly, these functions are not exclusively reserved for natural disaster responses; rather, the medical center is encouraged to be utilized at all times as a superior alternative to existing medical treatment centers in the rural area where Vista Fuerte is situated.
  • Storage and pantry: The primary purpose of this building is to provide storage for equipment, non-perishable food, and other miscellaneous items. Additionally, the top floor will house a food dispensary for the civilian population of the Vista Fuerte area.

2.3 Additional structures

The last two buildings in the project have the task of assuring maximum efficiency to the main three buildings.

  • Maintenance and service: This building serves as the operational core of the complex, housing essential systems required for its functioning. These systems include but are not limited to, storage for solar panel batteries, water collected from water collection systems, electrical generators, and a meeting area.
  • Housing: Designed to house staff that is required to be on-site for daily operations.

Supplies

Softwares

  • Revit (Modeling)
  • SolidWorks (Proof of Concept)
  • SketchUp (Conceptualizing)
  • Canva (Illustrations)


Sketching

Creation 

The project did not initially begin with its current vision, as it underwent significant evolution through numerous meetings with my ACE mentor. If it were not for their guidance, my vision would not have advanced to its current state.

The Vista Fuerte project originated with a rudimentary 2D sketch in my sketchbook. At the outset, my focus was on devising a small-scale solution to enable coastal inhabitants to dwell directly on the beach, withstanding heavy flooding. Several aspects of the initial sketch have persisted through to the final design. These enduring elements include:

  • Use of 20ft containers as the primary building material
  • Elevation of containers on platforms supported by pillars
  • Incorporation of concrete pillars to uphold the raised platform upon which the containers are positioned

In Sketch 2, the project entered a significant developmental phase. I began to explore the use of multiple container units; a point at which the terms "village" and "community center" were initially introduced during my participation in ACE mentor program meetings. Although these terms held little significance at the time, they would later exert a profound influence. The sketch also revealed various design decisions that did not carry through to the final design, a trend that will become more apparent in subsequent sketches. Notably, this sketch features three containers positioned at ground level, a concept that I deliberately moved away from to avoid restricting accessibility to certain areas of the buildings due to potential flooding.

Sketch 3, although less refined than its predecessors, represents an equally crucial stage in the project's development. This sketch introduces a significant deviation from the earlier iterations, particularly in the configuration of platforms within the project. This alteration serves as the foundational concept for delineating distinct functional responsibilities within the initial form of the current iteration.

Sketch 4, illustrates the concept of a concrete bridge connecting two distinct platforms in a formal manner. While initial sketches depicting this idea may have been informal, it became imperative to solidify this concept through a formal sketch to validate its feasibility.

In Sketch 5, we observe a more formal iteration of the preceding designs. A distinctive feature of this sketch is the introduction of a configuration where two containers are stacked atop each other, a design element that has persisted and is prominent in the final product.

In Sketch 6, we witness the pivotal moment when the project's various components start falling into place. With a clearer grasp of the project's scope, the attention shifts towards the commencement of the individual building creation process. This marks the initiation of a test building, serving as the prototype to validate the overarching concept of how the containers will be positioned and interconnected in the final construction.

In the transition from Sketch 6 to 7, I arrived at a profound realization regarding the purpose of the buildings. With this clarity, subsequent buildings were meticulously created to seamlessly align with specific functional requirements. This marked a fundamental shift in the approach towards the construction of the buildings, as each structure was tailored precisely to fulfill its designated purpose within the larger architectural composition. 

In Sketch 7, we witness the pivotal moment when the project's various components start falling into place. With a clearer grasp of the project's scope, the attention shifts towards the commencement of the individual building creation process. This marks the initiation of a test building, serving as the prototype to validate the overarching concept of how the containers will be positioned and interconnected in the final construction.

  • The proposed medical buildings encompass a series of concepts inspired by the medical field, exemplified by the structuring of a low-scale medical building fabricated from a total of 4, 20ft containers.
  • The primary objective of the command building is to optimize the operational capacity of the existing facilities, intending to serve as a central mobilization point for a distinct offsite control center. This design comprises a configuration of 2, 20ft containers alongside a 40ft container, strategically integrated to empower functionality and operational efficacy.
  • Moreover, the Drone structure is methodically engineered to accommodate the comprehensive servicing and deployment of drones. The prominent feature of this design lies in its helipad-style landing pads specifically tailored for drones, located on the rooftop. This innovative approach to drone infrastructure underscores a forward-thinking perspective aimed at maximizing the operational potential of the facility.
  • The Housing Unit initially conceptualized as a residential module catering to single-family occupancy, is meticulously designed to address the housing needs of families displaced by flooding. This underscores a humane and empathetic approach to architectural design, prioritizing practical and compassionate considerations in equal measure.
  • Lastly, the Storage Unit embodies a simple yet astute design, conceived with scalability in mind to accommodate multiple units of its kind. The most salient feature of this design is the incorporation of solar panels on the rooftop, emphasizing a steadfast commitment to sustainable energy practices. Notably, the fixed installation of solar panels is deliberate, designed to streamline installation and maintenance procedures, thereby underscoring an unwavering dedication to operational efficiency and environmental stewardship.

Sketch 8 represents the culmination of the traditional sketches, directly descended from the preceding storage building depicted in Sketch 7. However, it introduces a novel concept aimed at preventing the necessity for multiple buildings, instead emphasizing the indispensability of a single centralized storage unit. Furthermore, this design incorporates a secondary utilization on the topmost floor, demonstrating a multifaceted approach to spatial efficiency and functionality. The integration of solar panels from the previous iteration is seamlessly perpetuated, underscoring a sustained commitment to sustainable energy practices and environmental conscientiousness.

While traditional isometric sketching served me effectively, I recognized the need to modernize my approach. I transitioned to utilizing SketchUp, which allowed for a more efficient exploration of ideas and concepts. Later on in the project, I was able to use Autodesk software (Revit) with additional time in the school Design Lab. Below are some of the very first test models.

The evolution from the initial concept to the final product entailed a significant upscaling of the project. The original concept of Vista Fuerte solely serving as a launching point for reactive response was redefined to align more closely with the notion of a multirole complex. Notably, the buildings were endowed with the capacity to accommodate civilians if the need arose. This shift is particularly evident in the redesign of the medical building, which now serves a dual purpose, capable of administering medical aid even in the absence of natural disasters. The transformation of the medical building into a superior alternative to the local paramedic and small medical center became the focal point of its design, reflecting an enhanced emphasis on comprehensive medical provisions and emergency response capabilities.

With the completion of the building designs, the focus shifted to organizing them to ensure maximum efficiency. The primary concern was the potential impact of wind on the structures, encompassing considerations of uplift and the effects on occupants within the buildings. It was imperative to minimize the formation of wind tunnels within the complex. The following infographic illustrates the theoretical airflow patterns around and throughout the complex, highlighting the strategic approach taken to address wind-related considerations

An additional critical consideration in the placement of the individual units was analyzing how each facility would interact with one another. The underlying concept of the complex mirroring a cohesive village community remained integral to the overall design ethos. The following graphic delineates the intricate interplay and synergistic functionality among the diverse components of the complex, vividly portraying how this village-like model not only fosters operational cohesion but enhances the overall utility and resilience of the entire complex. 

Revit Model

Annotation 2024-06-10 151707.png
Annotation 2024-06-10 151659 (2).png
Annotation 2024-06-10 145407 (1).png
Annotation 2024-06-10 151718.png
Annotation 2024-06-10 151711 (1).png
Annotation 2024-06-10 151653 (1).png

Implementation 

In the context of the Make It Resilient Contest, the utilization of Autodesk software was a mandatory requirement. When considering which software to design my project with, my inclination was toward utilizing Solidworks due to my familiarity with the program; despite it not being the most appropriate option available. Even in the initial stages of the project, I expressed reservations about the use of Solidworks due to its inherent requirement for manual execution of rudimentary tasks, which contrasts with the capabilities of other Autodesk softwares such as Revit. Undoubtedly, Revit emerged as the most appealing alternative owing to its facilitation of a swifter and more seamless design process. Despite this, I encountered the limitation of having minimal to no prior experience with the software. Nevertheless, through guidance from my ACE mentor, I promptly discerned that the learning curve associated with Revit would prove to be a worthwhile investment of time and effort, particularly when weighed against the comparatively labor-intensive nature of Solidworks.

Revit Model

With the software chosen, the more technical aspect of the project began. One that would test my mind and bring me out of my comfort zone. This aspect of the project seemed the most challenging at first but after stepping into it, I realized that this was just the first step. This competition has led me to learn things I otherwise wouldn’t have had this early. And Revit is one of those. Now for a step-by-step guide on not just the AutoDesk model but the learning process and rationale behind the elements of the project.

In the initial stage of utilizing AutoDesk software, I generated a SolidWorks model. This endeavor was primarily an exercise in establishing a proof of concept derived from the initial sketch. Beyond serving as a mere software trial, it also functioned as a testing ground for various concepts, principally the utilization of shipping containers as the foundation for the structure. Furthermore, it provided a platform for assessing the potential systems that the structure could accommodate on a smaller scale.

After finalizing the conceptual sketches, the software platform was transitioned to Revit, which became the new host for Vista Fuerte. With guidance from my mentor, I initially acquired a fundamental understanding of Revit. Subsequently, as the creation of Vista Fuerte progressed, my proficiency within the software expanded exponentially through self-improvement, deepening my investigation into the software, and seeking assistance from external sources.

My approach initially involved the creation of elements that were replicated across the buildings. This strategy aimed to ascertain the project's constructability without the need for any specialized or complex techniques, ensuring global accessibility. The foremost element entailed the columns, serving the dual function of supporting the concrete slabs atop which the containers would be placed, as well as securing the containers in the event of heavy winds. Consistent with the project's compositional elements, each instance of the columns does not remain identical. The columns extend to varying heights based on the elevation of the host building.

The subsequent undertaking involved the construction of walls that were distinct from the walls of the shipping containers. These walls primarily functioned as wind load diverters for the complex. Concrete was chosen as the material for constructing these walls due to its high global accessibility as well as its strength.

The second part of the approach was the 1-foot thick concrete slab. Rather than having one single slab cover the whole thing, it was divided by each building's footprint and the walkways that would connect them. Similar to the previous element, the slab does not remain the same throughout. For the pantry/storage and the Command and Control building the floor is set at a different height this was principally designed to protect the items that would be within these buildings. Additionally, it was to increase the aesthetic appeal and increase the imitation of a village.

Subsequently, the next task involved the creation of the primary staircases throughout the complex. This exemplified one of many instances where Revit became the better option for the project over SolidWorks, primarily due to Revit's capacity to incorporate pre-designed features without necessitating manual input of heights, distances, or further details regarding the stairs. Additionally, Revit afforded me the flexibility to customize the appearance of the stairs, notably exemplified by the handrails accompanying the stairs.

The most substantial aspect of the project, present since its inception in the initial sketch, entailed the incorporation of the shipping containers. Rather than sourcing a pre-existing Revit family for a shipping container, I opted to manually construct the container walls, given the requirement for some buildings to accommodate multiple containers positioned adjacent to each other, often with specific walls featuring cutouts. This decision entailed certain trade-offs, including time constraints and various challenges. Due to the limited time available in the drafting lab at my school, the containers could not be detailed to the same extent as a typical container. This posed a significant challenge that demanded an extensive investigation to ascertain the most suitable method for replicating the appearance of shipping container walls. Ultimately, I discovered that creating a profile and subsequently applying it to preset walls proved to be the most effective approach for the model. This method necessitated commencing with the creation of the walls, introducing a new challenge in the form of crafting the concrete slabs intended to serve as both a roof and a divider between containers. Once all the walls and concrete slabs were in place, I proceeded to incorporate the profile into the walls. This involved individually creating a single instance of the profile for each wall before generating an array of the profile, a process repeated for all the shipping container walls.

Between all of the previous steps, I began tinkering with Level 0 of the complex. This phase encompassed the meticulous planning and implementation of roadways, pedestrian walkways, and green spaces. Initially, the project had operated under the presumption that a majority of employees would reside offsite, thereby influencing the initial progression of the project. However, as the project broadened its scope and capabilities, the imperative need for parking accommodations was an idea that was initially disregarded. But in the end a modest three specially designated parking spaces for employees who would be living on site. The reason why it would only be three would be due to the original assumption of most employees living offsite with only a select few necessitating onsite residencies for continuous operations within the complex. Parking for both employees and emergency vehicles can be seen in the following graphic.

  

Two ramps were strategically positioned to enhance the accessibility of the complex. The first ramp was placed on the road-accessible side of the medical building to facilitate the connection between the ground floor and the typical floor level. The second ramp was designed to link the typical floor level with the command building floor. Both of these initiatives posed some of the most challenging components of the entire complex. Extensive exploration of diverse methodologies for integrating these elements into the complex, coupled with numerous trial and error endeavors, ultimately culminated in a viable solution. The creation of a floor element to align with the intended path of the ramp proved pivotal. Subsequently, the "Modify Sub Elements" tool was employed to manipulate specific points along the designated path of the floor to achieve varying heights. Despite the relative simplicity encountered in the process of implementing the linear path of the second ramp, significant challenges were encountered in the case of the ramp connecting the ground floor to the medical building due to the substantial elevation differential between the two. This was further compounded by the imperative for a low slope, which necessitated a wider footprint for the ramp. The limited space available for the ramp added another layer of complexity to the design. The final resolution involved the creation of a spiral ramp, which not only facilitated the attainment of a sufficiently low slope but also occupied a smaller overall footprint.

The consideration of smaller details was deferred until the later stages of the project due to their inherently time-consuming nature. Among the most intricate and labor-intensive aspects were the handrails, which were initially envisioned to feature a unique design. In the initial conceptualization, the handrails were intended to be fabricated from sheet metal and affixed to the staircases, to enhance the visual appeal of the project. However, this design proposition was ultimately discarded as it contradicted the fundamental principles guiding the project, which prioritized simplicity, functionality, and accessibility within the complex's design ethos.

Naturally, it is acknowledged that the project is not without imperfections, attributable to a variety of factors including time constraints and limitations stemming from my proficiency with the software. One such imperfection pertains to the color scheme employed for the walls of the containers. Initially, the plan outlined a color-coded plan intended to align each building with a hue representative of its respective function. Regrettably, this objective was not fully realized within the project timeline due to various temporal constraints but with all those constraints, I was still able to edit the material that the container walls had been specifically made out of to an orange color. That decision was made to ensure that the complex would stand out within the raging storms and floods. Additionally, several nuanced elements of the landscaping were left out from the final iteration, mirroring the fate of the handrails. The intention behind the landscaping design was to harmonize visual aesthetics with practical functionality specific to the project. Furthermore, the comprehensive array of utilities and services that Vista Fuerte could accommodate did not materialize as envisioned. Nonetheless, an unplanned element of the project is created, there is a total 1280 sqft rooftop area that holds the ability to host any necessary amount or type of service. The project from its very roots was not meant to be a single project but rather a complex that could be replicated across the globe. Due to that wide spectrum of sites, each area would have unique needs. The rooftop area now allows for a small costimulation to the complex depending on their need. 

 The project's evolution has surpassed the confines of the original sketch, seemingly outgrowing the compatible 3D model file size as well. To afford you, the viewer, a comprehensive understanding of the project, I have decided to embed the 3D model from the SketchUp software. This representation serves as the blueprint for the final Revit model and bears an overwhelmingly close resemblance. By providing access to this intricate 3D model, I aim to ensure a complete and detailed portrayal of the project's essence and design intricacies.

Physical Model

IMG_3277.jpg
IMG_3245.jpg
IMG_3255.jpg
IMG_3273.jpg
IMG_3250.jpg
IMG_3257.jpg
IMG_3263.jpg
IMG_3268.jpg

While the Revit model was being created during school hours, the second part of my day was focused upon the construction of the physical model. During the development of the physical model of Vista Fuerte, a series of critical decisions were made regarding the creation process. This model marked a first in my career, prompting me to seek inspiration and a starting point for this endeavor. Numerous intricate models caught my attention, however, it became evident that they would necessitate specialized materials. This realization precipitated the initial task of ascertaining the available resources at my disposal. Fortunately, an assortment of materials was readily accessible within the Design lab at my school. While this provided a foundational framework, it also imposed certain limitations on the project. Nevertheless, I promptly overcame this obstacle by employing self-derived construction techniques for the model. Throughout the entire process, I continually experimented with and refined these techniques, ultimately discovering improved methods for implementing them. The subtle distinctions are evident in each building as a reflection of the varied construction techniques and materials employed in their creation. 

Now a step-by-step process of the physical model. 

  • Step 1: Material Selection and Initial Applications


  The commencement of the project necessitated careful consideration regarding the selection and utilization of suitable materials. Among the array of available options, four primary materials were discerningly chosen based on their accessibility and aesthetic appeal. These materials comprised a diverse range of wood, foam board, cardboard, and plastic cutouts of textures. It is imperative to highlight that cardboard played a pivotal role throughout the project, serving as the primary material for both the initial and final construction stages, particularly in the creation of the container walls. Notably, the early stages witnessed the use of cardboard as the material for constructing columns, a decision prompted by the limited availability of wood in smaller dimensions at the project's outset. However, this application was not retained throughout the project, signifying a deliberate shift in construction strategies as the project advanced.

  • Step 2: Column Construction Strategy


  An initial approach was adopted to commence the model construction by prioritizing the fabrication of columns, with a focus on leveraging the available materials. Notably, the larger columns were crafted from cardboard, while the smaller counterparts were meticulously fashioned from the limited quantity of small wood at hand. This deliberate sequence aimed to address the labor-intensive and repetitive aspects of the project at the outset, thereby establishing a systematic framework for subsequent phases of the model construction.

  • Step 3: Integration of Structural Components.


Following the completion of the columns, the focus shifted towards the assembly of the smaller structural elements to form the foundational framework of the model. This pivotal phase involved the meticulous integration of these components, mirroring real-world building techniques to establish the rudimentary framework of the structure. Inspired by established architectural and construction practices, this process required a synthesis of precision and innovation, as the smaller parts were methodically assembled to lay the essential structural groundwork.

  • Step 4: Advancement of Principal Building Structures. 


Subsequently, significant progress was made with the construction of the principal buildings. An intriguing development emerged when a lucky discovery of wood of appropriate size and thickness presented itself. This had notable implications, such as the opportunity to enhance both the structural integrity and aesthetic appeal of the buildings. Consequently, previously established buildings saw the replacement of certain columns with the new found wood, thereby elevating their overall robustness and visual allure. Moreover, this discovery had a ripple effect on the construction process, as it meant that the remaining buildings, whose foundational structures had not yet been realized, would be fashioned using this superior material, aligning with the overarching objective of enhancing both the structural and visual aspects of the entire model. 

  • Step 5: Implementation of Structural Enclosure


Here, the structural elements represented the "bones," and the forthcoming step was akin to applying the "skin" to the architectural model. This entailed the utilization of cardboard to envelop the structures, effectively serving as the external walls. As an integral aspect of the construction, the incorporation of these walls would decisively influence the aesthetic presentation and overall impression of the entire model. It is noteworthy that the installation of the cardboard walls brought about a distinctive transformation in the visual appearance of the entire architectural representation, underscoring the pivotal role of this stage in altering the model's overall aesthetic character.

  • Step 6: Integration of Floor Features


The augmentation of the structural elements was significantly facilitated by the availability of plastic textures. This resource proved instrumental in enhancing the flooring of the architectural model, contributing to the overall spatial and aesthetic refinement of the structure. The adept application of the plastic textures effectively elevated the visual and tactile dimensions of the model, underscoring the intricate interplay between materiality and design principles. This phase represented a strategic endeavor aimed at refining the internal features of the architectural model, further reinforcing the comprehensive and meticulous approach undertaken to ensure the advancement of the project.

Steps 1-6 are presented as self-imposed guidelines, recognizing that each building is characterized by specific constraints and features that may necessitate tailored adjustments to these steps. It was crucial to meticulously contemplate the unique requirements of each building and modify them correspondingly. Meticulous attention to detail was imperative for optimizing the effectiveness of the creation process of the model. 

  • Step 7: Integration of Individual Building Sections and Finalization 


Throughout the iterative construction process, each building was meticulously developed within its dedicated section. This strategic approach was intentionally adopted to enable concurrent and parallel advancement on multiple facets of the project, thereby enhancing the overall efficiency and progress of the construction endeavor. Moreover, a key consideration underlying this compartmentalized approach was the prudent management of spatial resources, with the systematic segregation serving to optimize workspace utilization. As the project advanced and each section reached completion, the culmination of these distinct components converged to form the comprehensive architectural entity of Vista Fuerte. Subsequently, in the unification of these individual sections, the meticulous placement of the final details marked the decisive transition to the culmination and ultimate realization of Vista Fuerte, underscoring the comprehensive and detail-oriented nature of the finalization process.

A noticeable distinction exists between this model and the Autodesk model. This distinction is rooted in my thought process. As I started working with the physical model, I began to discern subtle adjustments that would not only enhance the overall aesthetics of the project but also its functionality. This transformation is particularly evident in the residential building. It signifies a gradual shift from prioritizing functionality to embracing a more artistic perspective. Through my newfound artistic lens, these changes came to life. While I wouldn't explicitly state that I have a favorite building, the commonly used parental phrase "I don't have a favorite child" comes to mind. However, as every youngest child knows, this is not entirely true. Not because the parent has chosen to favor that child, but because the parent has learned from previous experiences and applied improvements with the last child. Similarly, with my project, as the housing building was the last to be created, I learned from past weaknesses and transformed them into strengths. My affection lies with the housing unit in the physical model.

I'd like to add a slightly different note regarding the use of AI. I intentionally decided not to utilize artificial intelligence in any part of the project's creation. My purposeful decision to refrain from AI was driven by my desire for the project to be a true reflection of my efforts. While AI can undoubtedly offer efficient shortcuts to achieve objectives, I actively chose to forgo such shortcuts to fully immerse myself in the learning experience presented by this project. Although the idea of employing AI for rendering did intrigue me initially, extensive exploration of various software led me to the realization that AI tends to generate its ideas and implement changes autonomously. This contrasted with my vision of preserving the project's natural, realistic essence as closely as possible to my original concept. Ultimately, AI did not align with this fundamental objective.


End

This year is marked as my sophomore year in high school, I made the conscious decision to pursue a career in a specific field, marking the initial steps of my personal and professional journey. Participating in the Make It Resilient Instructables competition has provided a remarkable opportunity to advance along this path.

Similarly, this project embarked on a transformative journey. What initially began as a mere idea quickly evolved and expanded as my imagination sparked with creativity, envisioning the multitude of forms that the initial sketch could potentially manifest into. It was exhilarating to translate all these ideas onto paper, and with invaluable guidance from my ACE mentor, these ideas gained purpose and significance, leading to the generation of even more innovative concepts. Surmounting the initial challenge posed by unfamiliar software, I have since honed a remarkable proficiency within it to the extent that I now consider myself adept and comfortable in its utilization.

Every project, irrespective of its scale, embodies a unique narrative, one that is limited only by the creator's imagination and their unwavering determination to see their vision through to fruition. Vista Fuerte has become my personal narrative. Similar to a compelling story, this project has not culminated in its final chapter; instead, it exists as a burgeoning concept, poised to blossom into reality once the opportune moment arises. Just as a story unfolds with time, so too does Vista Fuerte await the perfect juncture for its complete realization.